Showing posts with label Pagan Square. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pagan Square. Show all posts
A little while ago, Terence P Ward, who blogs with me at PaganSquare but also has his own blog--True Pagan Warrior--brought up tithing in a Pagan context. A tith, in general, is regarded as a tenth part of one's annual income contributed voluntarily or due as a tax, especially for the support of the clergy or church. It's generally regarded as a Jewish of Christian thing, but as Terance said, there are many reasons for Pagans to adopt tithing in their practice:

"1.Giving is a good thing. A lot of gods say so, maybe some of yours.
2.10% is an easy calculation, just move the decimal place over one spot to the left.
3.The process can be automated by your bank or payroll office in a lot of cases, making it painless."

He also gives a few examples, including donating to charities that support the environmental, social, or other goals which drew you into your Pagan path, using it to support political actions or campaigns that are in keeping with that path, or send money to a church you belong to, or contribute to a Pagan temple fighting a battle for full recognition.

I live in The Netherlands, for those who had forgotten, and as far as I can tell, there is exactly one initiative--translated as 'The Goddess Temple'--that I could tith to in a religious context, and their ways are so far removed from my own that I cannot possibly support them financially. There are no local initiatives, and the few volunteer projects that could potentially use money for support are--again--so far removed from my path that I will not tith to them. This is going beyond the fact that I will have a negative income until my current job negotiations go through. For me, this post is largely academic at this point.

Tithing generally involves money, but for the purpose of discussing Pagan--or better, Hellenistic--tithing, I suggest we loosen the definition some. You see, I think tithing is important. Tithing means sacrificing something important, something real, in the name of your Gods. In ancient Hellas, temple construction and subsequent use were generally financed from two sources, with a third source being a minor factor; public sponsors and private sponsors, as well as donations.

Public sponsors were governmental, including the bodies and institutions that administrated important sanctuaries. Weathy citizens and archons provided another large portion of the required money through taxes or special levies, or by the sale of raw materials like silver. Especially for sanctuaries that were visited by inhabitants from the whole of Hellas--like Delphi or Olympia--donations were a source of income. 'Wealthy', in this case, was a relative term and many citizens ended up contributing in some way. One of the most well known taxes which paid for religious services was the leitourgia.

Leitourgia comes from the ancient Helenic word 'leitos' (from leos, people) meaning public, and, 'ergo', 'to do'. As such, a leitourgos was 'a man who performs a public duty'; a public servant. Leitourgia were semi-voluntary financial contributions made by the most wealthy of citizens and métoikos in order to finance the state's public expenses in areas of war, theater, and religious worship. The practice was not just prevalent in ancient Athens, it stretched all the way to Rhodos and beyond. The system dates back to the early days of Athenian democracy, but gradually fell into disuse by the end of the 4th century BC.

Men became leitourgoi because of the prestige it brought to them and their family. It was a matter of honor to take part in the practice. The leitourgoi to the festival or war effort were loudly declared, and often plaques with their name on it were put up to show everyone who had financed the affair. Still, many were exempt from serving, and others tried to get out of it at all cost.

I think we should consider adding the giving of goods and time to the Pagan version of tithing. To give food and toys to the needy on a sacred day of the Gods--and to state this to the Gods and those recieving--for example, is as much a way of supporting the community as supporting it through a tith to its local religious center. In fact, even if there was a temple to Athena in my city's center, I think the community at large would be helped more if I donated to my local food bank or homeless shelter than to my temple--not too many people in my community would be part of my temple, but many of them would still need help providing food to their families. How about spending a little time volunteering at your local senior citizen home? Or cleaning up the local forest--especially if you frequent it for worship? How about helping out a freind in need? There are many ways to give back to the Gods and your community that do not nessesarily require a steady income from which you can skim ten percent.

Looking at the ancient Hellenic practice, it is interesting to me that tithing and modern volunteering is concidered something you do silently, humbly. A Christian influence, no doubt. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but it removes the extrinsic motivation from the equation, making it a lot less likely anyone will participate. Lets face it, if no one pats you on the back for something you can hardly afford doing, how long are you going to keep it up? Especially without the peer pressure of a religious community that you see every Sunday in church? Without recognition, without honor, only very few people will gladly give something they could use themselves--be it money or the little free time they might have. Intrinsic motivation is a powerful thing, but it takes a lot more effort than extrinsic motivation.

I would like to break the taboo on recognising someone for their efforts. If you manage to give ten percent of your money or time to charity, a good cause, or--even better--your religious community, you deserve one hell of a pat on the back as far as I am concerned. You get bragging rights, and deserve a damn plaque. We do that at our local soccor club, so why not everywhere else? Why not recognise contributions in any way we can? I bet more people would be called to give if they got bragging rights afterwards. The ancient Hellenes had that figured out already, and that's 2000+ years ago.

Giving back is important, and personally, I hardly give anything back to my local community. When I have a steady income, I will donate to the local food back on a regular basis, hopefully every Noumenia. That would, at least, be something. I also visit my girlfriend's grandmother regularly, and spend time with her, mostly by taking her out walking. I also give (back) to my religious community. I blog, work on a volunteer basis with Elaion, and help my fellow worshippers with their questions. I would like to do more, but with the limited religious options presented to me locally, and a limited amount of time and money, this is the best I can do. It is something I hope to change in the future, but this is what I do, for now. This is my honor, my brag. What is yours?
Two months ago, I decided that on the day of the Hene Kai Nea, I'd post a monthly update about things that happened on the blog. Then, the month after it, the Deipnon fell on a Friday, so I posted a Pagan Blog Project post. The day after, it was time for a mix-tape, so it didn't happen then either. Feeling the window to get away with an update had come and gone, I let it be for the time being. This month, I'm catching up on my updates, so it will be two month's worth.

Changes to the blog:
Statistics:
Anything else?
I will update the Google festival calendar this month, as it runs out with the start of the new Hellenic year. For the next month, it's still usable.

The post on the male statues' packages hit 1600 views on my PaganSquare blog, where I usually get between two and three-hundred views on a single post. I love reader questions: they make me look into things I might otherwise have missed, or would never have bothered to explain. Again, if you have a question you would like to ask about Hellenismos, ancient Hellas, Hellenic mythology, or anything else this blog covers, you can always contact me. If you would like me to write about a specific topic because you wonder about it, feel free as well. I would love to hear what's going on in your heads, and if I can help answer your questions in any way, it would be my pleasure. For now, thank you for the visit and until tomorrow, when we discuss household worship in ancient Hellas, modern times, and the Theoi that preside over it. 
Well, I can keep pretending that the day of the Hene Kai Nea will have a post about anything other than the updates I made to the blog (as part of my Deipnon clean-up), but that's not often the case, now is it? So from now on, I'll just come right out and say it: the day of the Deipnon, I'll post a monthly update about things that happened on the blog. The format might change, but the idea will be the same every month.

Changes to the blog:
Statistics:
Anything else?
Not really. You guys are awesome. Hitting a hundred likes on Facebook was quite the achievement for me. I''m grateful for every single one of you who visits, likes, comments, or engages me in any other way, including e-mails and personal messages. Again, if you have a question you would like to ask about Hellenismos, ancient Hellas, Hellenic mythology, or anything else this blog covers, you can always contact me. If you would like me to write about a specific topic because you wonder about it, feel free as well. I would love to hear what's going on in your heads, and if I can help answer your questions in any way, it would be my pleasure. For now, thank you for the visit and until tomorrow, when we discuss household worship in ancient Hellas, modern times, and the Theoi that preside over it. 
A few days ago, PaganSquare blogger Gus diZerega posted a blog post on nature religions within Paganism, a reply to a lovely post by Joseph Bloch. Paganism--as used by Gus--seems to include any pre-Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic religion, and is separate from Neo-Paganism, which he classifies as 'modern revival of Pagan spirituality by people coming from within modern society'. The focal point of Gus' post was that, whether the ancient or modern Pagan cultures agree or not, they were, and are, nature worshippers. As such, reconstructionists of said religions are also nature worshippers. I'm paraphrasing here, so please, read Gus' words for yourself.

I disagree with Gus' conclusions, but I will not go into his writing here. I simply introduce Gus and his post to introduce PaganSquare reader Trine, who commented on one of my replies to Gus with a question I would love to dedicate a blog post to. Her post went as follows:

"I am curious - would you be interested in writing a blog post on your Hellenistic view on the reverence of (or indifference to) nature and on pollution? What I read above is that oil spills, trash in the woods, bee hive death due to insecticides, etc. does not really concern you as much as other topics may, because Hellenism is not a nature-based religion. My question, or curiosity, regards how you would approach this in terms of your Gods - is an oil spill offensive to Poseidon? Is littering in the wild and limiting the natural habitats of wildlife offensive to Pan, or Artemis? And how did the Hellenes approach this?"

The first thing I will say, is that I am not an expert on anything, and the second that other Hellenists will have different views on this subject. It all depends on where you draw your inspiration for Reconstruction from; there are, after all, philosophical foundations for a more 'nature based Hellenismos', as we will see. What this post will focus on most, is that religion, philosophy, and ethics are connected, but they are not completely codependent. I don't want to spoil the surprise, but the conclusion of this post will be that nature is important within Hellenismos--it is partly though nature, after all, that the Theoi can manifest--but the focus in Hellenismos is different than in a nature based religions.

Perhaps I should take the time here to express my definition of 'nature worship'. Nature worship, for me, is a system of religion based on the veneration of natural forces and phenomenon--for example, celestial objects such as the sun and moon and terrestrial objects such as the elements, trees, and rain. These are seen as sacred, or holy, unto themselves, and not in relation to a deity or other higher power. In many nature religions, nature as a whole is considered a--or the--(supreme) deity, if the worship of Gods is included in the practice. Because nature and natural phenomenon are considered sacred or divine; preservation, eco-warriorship, and the minimization of the carbon footprint are often important influences within the religion or Tradition. The best description I have ever read of the practice of nature worship comes from Edain McCoy, whose teachings I have quite a bit of trouble with, but the quote applies and goes:

"The cycles of nature are our holy days, the earth is our temple, its plants and creatures our partners and teachers."

I think this is a beautiful sentiment, and have even felt this way for a good few years when I was just starting out. I still care greatly about the environment, and I recycle, try to take public transportation, and turn off the lights when I leave the house. I don't litter, and I try to pick up other people's trash whenever I'm out for a nature walk. I will most certainly call out those I see littering. I eat organic meat--if I eat meat at all--and buy animal products which have provided the best possible life to the animal the product came from. All of that, however, is not directly tied to my religion. It's because I'm a decent human being, who is aware of the destructive influence of humanity on the natural world, and if I have kids some day, I would like to leave them some of the beauty that the natural world can offer.

As for Hellenismos; Hellenismos has two major focus points: the Theoi, and community. Both are connected in some way to nature--both in a negative, and a positive way--but are also distinctly separate from it. The Theoi make Their presence known to us through natural phenomenon. Zeus Ombrios, for example, controls rain and thunderstorms. We might see a fight between Gods and giants in the eruption of a volcano. As ancient Hellenic philosopher Thales of Milete said: "all things are full of Gods".

Community mattered greatly, because the influence of one, could impact the many. If one person upset the Gods, the entire village of city could be punished--as the other members of the community did not stop this hubris. It was largely because of this dynamic, Socrates was put to death. In another response to a reader question, I discussed that everyone who was allowed to attend public festivals--and that differed per festival--was present for them, as it was a massive, state funded, boost of kharis for the city-state as well as everyone who attended.

When the Gods are displeased with us, They might fail the harvest, flood our lands, wreak havoc with earthquakes, or punish us in any number of other--nature related--ways. As such, proper worship of the Theoi was important. A natural disaster would always be followed by a flurry of divination and sacrifice: in order to prevent a second--perhaps even worse--disaster, it was vital to discover which Theos or Theia was displeased, and to appease Them with ritual and sacrifice. Perhaps, then, the Gods would look favorably upon Their followers again. Besides shared worship, the focus on community allowed the ancient Hellenes to survive, despite the hardship that the natural world could bestow upon them.

The ancient Hellenes lived in and with nature, but also struggled against it. Because the world was a dangerous place, it was vitally important to appease the Theoi closely connected to (natural) phenomenon before stepping out into it. Because of this, sailors would offer to Poseidon, traveling merchants would sacrifice to Hermes, and farmers would offer to Demeter. They hoped that their boat would not sink, that they would not be robbed and killed, and that their crops would grow, so they would have food to eat and surplus to trade or sell.

To return to the reader question: pollution wasn't a much known thing or issue in ancient Hellas. While the ancient Hellenes did some permanent damage to the environment--most notably in the poisoning of soil and water with mercury and lead--the extent of pollution was such that nature's natural processes could balance it out pretty decently. Modern day pollution is, of course, a fair bit more severe. It is everywhere. We're draining the planet dry, cutting forests down unapologetically, littering, overfishing, etc.

It is important to note that--especially post-Plato--the world was seen as a living organism on its own, which contained all other living organisms (a precursor to Lovelock's much later 'Gaia Theory'). Plato emphasized the interdependence between the micro and the macro, nature within and without. He also introduced or popularized the notion that the world was not created by the Gods, but that the Gods are craftsmen, fashioning a pre-existing and disordered natural world to make it fit an eternal and ideal pattern. The Hellenes before Plato would not share many of these ideas, so we return to the question of inspiration: from which time period does the reconstructionist reconstruct his or her practice?

If we look at Plato and Lovelock, we might interpret recent earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts, and other natural disasters as the planet's way of protecting itself from the influence of humanity. If we take this standpoint, and look at the philosophies of the Hellenic time period before Plato, we could still interpret these natural disasters as the will of the Gods. We explain modern ecological issues--global warming, for example--in a scientific manner, but that scientific phenomenon might just as well be the hand(s) of the Gods, like the ancient Hellenes believed. The Gods, or Lovelock's Gaia, displeased with humanity's disrespect of nature, of Them, of ourselves, of each other, or for any other number of reasons. I am getting a bit off-topic here, however.

I think we need to take better care of our planet, but I think the interpretation that an oil spill offends Poseidon is a modern one. It is such by necessity--as there were no oil spills in ancient Hellas--but it is important to note that Poseidon has control of the sea, He is not the sea. He might manifest in the wave that topples the boat, but He is not the wave. This is, in my view, the major difference between the ancient religions and the modern nature religions: the ancient Gods control nature, they are not nature itself. I do not worship Demeter by farming fields of gain, but I will need Her blessing if I want my harvest to succeed. I do not commit an offense towards Artemis by cutting down a forest, but She might still punish me for my actions if She had other plans for that forest, or the animals in it.

In ancient Hellas, there were small shrines put up at certain trees, lakes, and other features of nature: these were placed there to honor the home of the nymphs, and usually worshipped the nature spirit of said place, as well as the Theoi they were connected with. I mention the nymphs, because in the worship of dryad, nereids, oreads, and many of the others, one could potentially see the worship of nature. After all, this worship centers around a tree, a lake, a mountain, or any other feature of the landscape. Yet, the honors went to whomever lived inside that feature of the landscape, and while these beings were--and are--usually tied to this feature, they are, again, not part of it.

The ancient Hellenes were dependent on nature. There is no denying that. It is only logical that the Gods of the ancient Hellenes controlled that very nature the ancient Hellenes were so dependent on. This holds true today as well, even though the western world has largely lost sight of the role of nature in our lives. We perceive--by and large--that our food comes from the supermarket, not the field. If we need something, we order it with the click of a mouse button. If our car is out of gas, we fill up the tank at the nearest gas station.

Modern Hellenists have the religious obligation to retrace the route our household items have taken, and give proper thanks to the Theos or Theia who made it possible for us to make use of these items. The modern human has the ethical obligation to look at the way these items were produced--by the hand of child workers, sprayed with chemicals, at the expense of animals, etc--and decide if this is a trend they want to have continued. For Hellenists--who pride themselves on having a strong ethical framework--their actions might lean towards ecological activism, or at least personal 'green' behavior, but I dare say that this is philosophy, not religion, and there is a difference between the two. Religion and philosophy have a different goal; one to guide mankind in the way of the Theoi, the other to understand mankind. Both fuel the ethical framework of a person, but only one is religion.

My religion is not a nature religion: my religion focuses on the Theoi, and the influence They have on my life, and the lives of those I love. Nature, in my religious views, is a medium through which my Gods can manifest. My philosophical views inspire me to see the world as a beautiful whole, of which I am am a tiny part. My ethical framework requires me to take responsibility for my consumption of goods and services, and to limit the harm I do to my environment to the best of my abilities. I am not an eco-warrior. That is not my ethical path in life, but I am a 'green' person. Yet, my ethical framework is not my philosophy, nor my religion. My philosophy is not my religion, nor my ethical framework, and my religion is not my ethical framework nor my philosophy. The three overlap, are tied together in a way that cannot be unbound, but they are not the same. This is why my religion is not a nature religion.
A lot has changed for me over the last few months. I took the leap of faith needed to finally embrace Hellenismos, I started to blog and now, I have joined Pagan Square as a regular blogger. Especially the last one came as a complete surprise.

I have known for a least a year, I would be transitioning to Hellenismos. It was inevitable. Even when I first started out, I connected almost solely to the Hellenic pantheon. When I called the God and Goddess, I used the names of the Theoi. The Hellenic pantheon offered such a beautiful mix of endless power and possibilities, offset with Gods who erred, that I could relate without even trying. It was easy to see why these beings were Gods and how They related to my life. Yet, back then, I was also firmly trustful of the God and Goddess, and  letting Them go proved hard.

As I went through my life and progressed from Neo-Wicca to Technopaganism, Hedge Witchcraft and eventually on the Eclectic Religious Witchcraft, I realized that I was heading towards a crossroads. Oh how fitting, that term, because it was Hekate, Goddess of Crossroads, who eventually opened my eyes to the truth I had been denying; if I wanted to properly honor the Theoi, I needed to let go of the Neo-Wiccan framework in which I had been forcing Them, and let Them be their own Gods and Goddesses. I needed to start worshipping Them in a way which They were used to, a way designed especially for Them.

And I did.

From one day onto the next, I left behind everything I had been doing and started a daily, Hellenic, practice. It's been one of the best decisions of my life. Daily practice gives me stability and keeps me ever mindful of the Gods. I have come to realize that much of what I have always done, believed and practiced are close to Hellenismos. This is why the transition was easy. I simply put my faith in the Gods and They showed me that I really did not need to change anything in myself, just in my practice. I already lived my life with Their ethics in mind, I already saw the importance of family, of piety, of a daily connection to the Gods.

Trusting the Gods is not easy, but it's one of the pillars of Hellenismos. To do otherwise would be hubris. As I trusted the Gods when I transitioned into Hellenismos, I also trust Them now, as I join the ever-growing community at Pagan Square. I trust that this is the right thing for me to do at this time and, in the process, I hope to convey some of the fundamentals of Hellenismos to seekers and those who may simply be interested.

For the readers of this blog, nothing changes. This is my home base. Posts will appear here first. After that,t he Hellenic posts get doubled over to Pagan Square. Some as is, others with some slight editing as I have no history to fall back on. Still, Baring the Aegis on blogspot is my home and it will continue to be so. I want to thank all of you for reading this blog and making this possible.